Hi, I just scanned through the draft. I noticed that there is no full mapping of the SDP parameters from RFC3267 to generic parameters. Is there a reason for the difference. I think that there should be some text that will explain the relationship to H.245 annex I. Roni Even

-----Original Message----- From: Venkata Nanduri [mailto:vnanduri@cisco.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 12:33 AM To: itu-sg16@external.cisco.com; ari.lakaniemi@NOKIA.COM Cc: vnanduri@cisco.com Subject: Proposal to support AMR codec in H.245 using RFC3267

Dear SG16 experts,

I would like the attached proposal to be submitted to next meeting of SG16 group to be held at Melbourne in February last week, 2005.

Before I submit the proposal formally, I would like to get some early feedback on the proposal from experts in the group.

Can you please review the document and let me know your comments?

Thanks Venkata