Re: Doubt about CallLinkage structure in IRR message
Aseem, That is definitely a typographical error-- the callLinkage field should definitely contain the OPTIONAL modifier. I will make a correction to this and make mention of it at the next Question 13/16 meeting. Thanks for pointing that out. Best Regards, Paul ----- Original Message ----- From: "Aseem Agarwal" <aseem@trillium.com> To: <paul.jones@ties.itu.int> Cc: <h323implementors@imtc.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2000 7:15 PM Subject: Doubt about CallLinkage structure in IRR message
Hi Paul, Implementers' Guide for H.225V3 (H323V3_IG_0002.zip) has added CallLinkage structure to perCallInfo in IRR as a mandatory IE.
Since the Call Linkage is an optional feature, it should be an optional IE. Is this a mistake or there is a reason behind it? Kindly clarify.
thanks, aseem@trillium.com
participants (1)
-
Paul E. Jones