AW: Comments on H.225.0 v4 Whitedraft (sourceAddress)

24 Aug 2000

      Rich wrote:
"...Note that we allow the E.164 number to be included in both the
sourceAddress field and the Calling Party Number IE.  If we're saying
that it "shall" be in the IE, should we at least say that it "should
not" be included in the sourceAddress field?
..."

YES, we should state that the real E.164 number of the calling user shall be
in Calling Party Number IE and should not be in SourceAddress field.

Regards,
Karl

-----------------------------------------------------------
Karl Klaghofer / ICN EN HC SE 81
HiPath VoIP Enterprise Architecture & Standardization
Hofmannstr. 51, 81359 Munich, Germany
Tel.: +49 89 722 31488
Fax.: +49 89 722 37629
E-Mail: karl.klaghofer@icn.siemens.de

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Rich Bowen [mailto:rkbowen@CISCO.COM]
Gesendet am: Freitag, 21. Juli 2000 02:06
An: ITU-SG16@mailbag.cps.intel.com
Betreff: Re: Comments on H.225.0 v4 Whitedraft (sourceAddress)

Karl,

Glad you noticed this.  How about the following slight modification of
the wording that you proposed:

"sourceAddress - Contains the alias addresses of the source.  The
primary address shall be first.  Note that the E.164 Number of the
source, if any, shall be contained within the Calling Party Number
Information Element."

Note that we allow the E.164 number to be included in both the
sourceAddress field and the Calling Party Number IE.  If we're saying
that it "shall" be in the IE, should we at least say that it "should
not" be included in the sourceAddress field?

Regards,
Rich

Klaghofer Karl ICN EN HC SE 81 wrote:
...
One more try, since it seems that my previous mail I sent out yesterday
...
not arrive.
Regards,
Karl Klaghofer
...
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von:  Klaghofer Karl  ICN EN HC SE 81
Gesendet am:  Tuesday, July 18, 2000 12:02
An:   'ITU-SG16@mailbag.cps.intel.com'
Betreff:      Comments on H.225.0 v4 Whitedraft (sourceAddress)
Rich and others,
H.225.0v4 White draft, section 7.3.10 Setup reads:
"...
sourceAddress - Contains the alias addresses for the source; the dialed
digit string of the source is in the Q.931 Calling Party Number IE. The
primary address shall be first.
..."
PROPOSED TO BE CORRECTED TO:
"...
sourceAddress - Contains the alias addresses of the source. Note that
...
...
E.164 Number of the source is contained within Calling Party Number
Information Element. The primary address shall be first.
..."
Background:
As part of the global v4 change to replace the term "e164" by the term
"dialedDigits" in the whole H.225.0 document, the sentense in current v4
Whitedraft does not make sense anymore and should be corrected in v4 in
Portland. I think what we wanted to say is that the E.164 number is
contained within the Calling Party Number IE and not the dialed digit
string ! Dialed digit string (unstructured number which maybe may
include
prefixes, etc would be put into sourceAddress.dialedDigits).
Note: There might be further sections where the simple replacement of
did
the
the
...
...
term e164 by term dialed digits may have caused vagueness, since term
e164
in v2 was actually used for both - real E.164 but also unstructured
digit
strings.
Regards,
Karl Klaghofer
-------------------------------------------------------
Karl Klaghofer, Siemens AG
Dpmt ICN EN HC D81, VoIP Architecture & Standardization
Hofmannstr. 51, 81359 Munich, Germany
Tel.: +49 89 722 31488; Fax.: +49 89 722 37629
Mail: karl.klaghofer@icn.siemens.de
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to
listserv@mailbag.intel.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to
listserv@mailbag.intel.com

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to
listserv@mailbag.intel.com

Klaghofer Karl ICN EN HC SE 81

Rich Bowen

tags

participants (2)