Hi "Fix",
I don't think that I understand your reply. Do I always have to unregister my E.164 (if assigned) address and if so why?
Frank
----------------------------------------------------- Frank Derks |Tel +31 35 6893238 | Advanced Development |Fax +31 35 6891030 | Philips Business Communications|P.O. Box 32 | |1200 JD Hilversum | |The Netherlands | ----------------------------------------------------| E-mail: mailto:frank.derks@philips.com | WWW: http://www.sopho.philips.com | -----------------------------------------------------
fxk@TIDWEB.GRENOBLE.HP.COM@SMTP@MAILBAG.INTEL.COM on 11/02/2000 16:41:07 Please respond to ITU-SG16@MAILBAG.INTEL.COM@SMTP Sent by: ITU-SG16@MAILBAG.INTEL.COM To: ITU-SG16@MAILBAG.INTEL.COM@SMTP cc: Subject: Re: Description of EndpointAlias in URQ?? Classification: Restricted
"Frank" == Frank Derks frank.derks@PHILIPS.COM writes:
Frank> The "explanatory" text of the EndpointAlias element in the Frank> URQ message, contains the following sentence: "The E.164 Frank> address, if assigned, is required. " This sentence would seem Frank> to indicate that if I am unregistering, I always have to Frank> unregister the assigned E.164 address??? The sentence that Frank> follows, contradicts this: "Only values listed here are Frank> unregistered; this allows, for example, an H323_ID to be Frank> unregistered while leaving the E.164 address registered."
Frank> What is the intention of this sentence? Should I simply Frank> ignore it?
IMO, the sentence means "The E.164 address, if assigned [dynamically by the GK during registration procedure], is required".
Regards. Fix. -- Francois-Xavier KOWALSKI __________ Telecom Engineer Hewlett-Packard Company //_ o \/ Telecom Infrastructure Division Tel:+33 (0) 4 76 14 63 27 // // /\ Fax:+33 (0) 4 76 14 16 86 mailto:fxk@tidweb.grenoble.hp.com http://www.hp.com/go/opencall/
participants (1)
-
Frank Derks