Just another thought when reading the package.

I know, it's farfetched, but there seems to be already a "similar" solution defined:

There's already an H.248-based Stimulus Control Protocol: H.323 Annex L. Annex L incorporates Simple Endpoint Types (SET) according H.323 Annex F. Annex F incorporates "telephones with an RJ-45 connector", i.e., POTS terminals.

=> for that specific network scenario, and from a high-level perspective, there are obviously overlappings (e.g., analog line, H.248 control interface, stimulus control concept).

But I guess that the comparison of H.248.STIMAL versus H.248-based H.323 Annex L is inappropriate, mainly because - H.323 Annex L still uses normal call establihsment procedures of H.225.0 - H.323 Annex L approach is scoping supplementary services, not basic call setup/release - H.248.STIMAL is scoping basic call service, PSTN supplementary service are for instance scope of H.248.23

just an idea, Albrecht

"Jan Lindquist (AL/EAB)" To: TISPAN_WG3@LIST.ETSI.ORG <jan.lindquist@ER cc: ICSSON.COM> Subject: Re: H.248.V5 vs H.248.STIMAL; Re: [LS to SG16 RGW stimal package ] Approved Sent by: "TISPAN_WG3: Protocols" <TISPAN_WG3@LIST. ETSI.ORG>

19.08.2004 10:49 Please respond to "Jan Lindquist (AL/EAB)"

Hello Albrecht,

Actually the first liaison you refer to is indicating to SG16 the intention of TISPAN WG3 to create a new package, at the time there was no agreed package or package name. The new liaison indicates that there is now a package defined called stimal package and that there is an ambition to perform a joint publication between TISPAN and ITU-T, for more details refer to the new liaison.

I hope this answers your question.

Best regards, JanL

-----Original Message----- From: Albrecht.Schwarz@alcatel.de [mailto:Albrecht.Schwarz@alcatel.de] Sent: den 18 augusti 2004 18:01 To: raymond.forbes@MARCONI.COM; Jan Lindquist (AL/EAB); d.chohan@ftel.co.uk Cc: TISPAN_WG3@LIST.ETSI.ORG; megaco@ietf.org; itu-sg16@external.cisco.com Subject: H.248.V5 vs H.248.STIMAL; Re: [LS to SG16 RGW stimal package] Approved

Dear All!

A proposal for a H.248 V5 Package was presented at the last WP2/16 meeting: http://ftp3.itu.int/av-arch/avc-site/0405_Bei/AVD-2502a.zip

Question: is H.248.STIMAL replacing the H.248.V5 package proposal?

Thanks for clarification! Best regards Albrecht

Raymond Forbes raymond.forbes@MARCONI.COM@LIST.ETSI.ORG> on 18/08/2004 17:33:46

Please respond to Raymond Forbes raymond.forbes@MARCONI.COM

Sent by: "TISPAN_WG3: Protocols" TISPAN_WG3@LIST.ETSI.ORG

To: TISPAN_WG3@LIST.ETSI.ORG cc: Subject: Fw: [LS to SG16 RGW stimal package] Approved

WG3 delegates,

The Liaison Statement to ITU SG16 is now approved, see attachment.

Regards,

Ray Forbes. (TISPAN WG3 Chairman)

+44 24 7656 3106 phone +44 24 7656 3816 fax.

+44 771 851 1361 Mobile/text

This e-mail and any attachments are confidential.  If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your system.

(See attached file: 03bTDxxx LS_to_SG16_on_stimal_pkg_v2 approved.doc)

------------------------------------------------------------------- Mail archive for TISPAN_WG3 can be browsed at the following url : http://list.etsi.org/TISPAN_WG3.html -------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________ Megaco mailing list Megaco@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco