Yep. You are correct.

-----Original Message----- From: Paul Long [mailto:Plong@SMITHMICRO.COM] Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2000 8:01 AM To: ITU-SG16@MAILBAG.INTEL.COM Subject: Re: On TD26 - Fast TCS and M/S negotiation in H.323v4

(Whoops, I misunderstood. You were talking about actually tunneling an H.245 message in Setup. I was thinking you were just indicating tunneling, which is of course okay.)

-----Original Message----- From: Paul Long [mailto:plong@smithmicro.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2000 9:56 AM To: 'Mailing list for parties associated with ITU-T Study Group 16' Subject: RE: On TD26 - Fast TCS and M/S negotiation in H.323v4

Francois,

Tunneling and Fast Connect are orthogonal to each other. I can't find where v2 or v3 says that they cannot be done in parallel. As a matter of fact, this is how we implemented it. We are now very aggressive with call setup. What specific problems are there with doing them at the same time? We haven't found any.

Paul

For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to
listserv@mailbag.intel.com