Re: Mob ad hoc group progress
Hi, All:
Jakko may be right, but who knows. We may or may not define "intra-network" as additional term in our standard.
I just took Paul's suggestion of "intra-network" something like - "a user remains within a given network while roaming can be termed as intra-network roaming."
For example, a wireless LAN may have many point of attachments while the mobile user may move from one point of attachment to another of a given LAN, but it is still the same network. In this situation, the mobility of the user can be termed as the "intra-network" roaming.
Of course, there will be intra-domain, inter-domain roaming.
Similarly, there can be intra-zone and inter-zone roaming.
In the same token, there can be intra-network and inter-network roaming.
Contributions are there or underway to address all those issues.
Best regards, Radhika R. Roy AT&T
-----Original Message----- From: Jaakko Sundquist [SMTP:jaakko.sundquist@NOKIA.COM] Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2000 9:00 AM To: ITU-SG16@MAILBAG.INTEL.COM Subject: Re: Mob ad hoc group progress
Hi Paul & all,
Paul, thanks for the clarification. I just have one point: If intra network in fact means intra-domain, then maybe we should call it intra-domain, not intra-network. This is just to avoid any unnecessary new definitions.
- Jaakko
participants (1)
-
Roy, Radhika R, ALARC