It seems that I have a few problems to send this mail. I wish this time will be the good one...

------------------

Dear colleagues,

I'm Mr Azdine Tadrist, and as a colleague of Mr Jean-Pierre Blin, I spent a few times on a draft annex of H.323 regarding the use of V.140 for H.323 point-to-point communications over ISDN. This draft was discussed in Japan last February.

There it was decided that the annex should specify default PPP parameters that would be implemented by such terminals. Actually, as I was not in Japan, I don't really understand what was meant by PPP parameters ; did you mean LCP configuration options ?

If so, these parameters have default values defined in RFC 1661 ; does anybody disagree with using these values ?

Moreover, the same values could be set within a multilink configuration, as the same LCP rules apply in that case. Plus, we could recommend RFC 1990 (MP) as a choice for a multilink protocol, if there is nobody objects.

If you could be somehow helpful in that issue, or wanted to comment or even criticize these points, I would really appreciate. Thanks (and see most of you in Cannes).

-- -a-z-d-i-n-e------