Paul,
(For the record...) The change is OK by me.
Pete.
============================================= Pete Cordell Tech-Know-Ware pete@tech-know-ware.com +44 1473 635863 =============================================
----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul E. Jones" paulej@PACKETIZER.COM To: ITU-SG16@echo.jf.INTEL.COM Sent: 25 April 2002 00:38 Subject: H.460.1 editorial correction
Dear Experts,
I received a consultation from the TSB regarding H.460.1, as to whether it would be proper to introduce a clarification for text in the third
paragraph
of Section 7.2. Specifically, the proposed change is from
"If the feature is defined using ASN.1, then it is recommended that the
PER
encoding rules be used. ..."
to
"If the feature is defined using ASN.1, then it is recommended that the basic aligned variant of the PER encoding rules be used. ..."
I personally support the correction since all H.323 equipment uses the
basic
aligned variant for PER encoding and using anything else would be
incorrect.
I would like to give the OK to the TSB for implementing this editorial correction, but would like to confirm with you whether there are any concerns with this change. We could of course incorporate it via an Implementers Guide later on, but we have the opportunity to have it right from the start. If you have concerns, please let me know ASAP but
preferably
not later than April 29, 2002.
Best Regards, Paul