Paul,
You changed the text for the term multicast, but in H.323 the term is used also for T.120 which sends PDUs (see section 6.2.7)
So maybe it is not an error
Roni
________________________________
From: itu-sg16-bounces@lists.packetizer.com [mailto:itu-sg16-bounces@lists.packetizer.com] On Behalf Of Even, Roni Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 7:25 PM To: Paul E. Jones; itu-sg16@lists.packetizer.com Subject: Re: [itu-sg16] AVD 3299
Paul,
This works in point to point and I am not sure why you need multicast in this case. Also you are not doing multicast H.245. So there is an MC
Now let's take the case of an MC that has three participants in the multicast group.
The first one sends an OLC with payload type 100. The second one sends an OLC with payload type 101 and the third with payload type of 102. Now the MC needs to send an OLC to the first participant, which payload type should it use 101,102,100?
Roni
________________________________
From: Paul E. Jones [mailto:paulej@packetizer.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 6:47 PM To: Even, Roni; itu-sg16@lists.packetizer.com Subject: RE: [itu-sg16] AVD 3299
Roni,
I guess I am still missing your point. This is a means of sending media, just like unicast. The payload type numbers are selected by the sender, just as they are for unicast. If the recipient accepts the proposed OLC, then it would listen on the multicast address for incoming media accordingly.
Paul
From: Even, Roni [mailto:roni.even@polycom.co.il] Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 11:24 AM To: Paul E. Jones; itu-sg16@lists.packetizer.com Subject: RE: [itu-sg16] AVD 3299
Paul,
Is the multicast uni-directional, is it just a point to point. If it is to be used to enable the EP to send media to a multicast group this should be aligned with the media the other side except to receive. How does it get set
Roni
________________________________
From: Paul E. Jones [mailto:paulej@packetizer.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 6:20 PM To: Even, Roni; itu-sg16@lists.packetizer.com Subject: RE: [itu-sg16] AVD 3299
Roni,
I don't understand your concern. Can you clarify the problem?
Paul
From: itu-sg16-bounces@lists.packetizer.com [mailto:itu-sg16-bounces@lists.packetizer.com] On Behalf Of Even, Roni Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 11:06 AM To: itu-sg16@lists.packetizer.com Subject: [itu-sg16] AVD 3299
Hi,
I looked at the document and I think I understand the OLC procedure. I need it does not address how you decide on a dynamic payload type number when needed.
The OLC gives the dynamic payload type number to send
Roni