&#*&?$"@,

I also copied M.1 from some other draft (I don't remember which one). I will insert the "not" and send it back to the ITU.

I suspect that M.2 may have the same problem since I believe it was copied from M.1.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Espen Skjæran (ETO) [mailto:Espen.Skjaeran@ETO.ERICSSON.SE]
> Sent: Friday, July 07, 2000 6:46 AM
> To: ITU-SG16@MAILBAG.INTEL.COM
> Subject: Re: Intellectual property/patents on H.323 Annex K???
>
>
> Frank,
> This is positively a mistake. I copied the whole header from
> H.323 Annex M.1 in Geneva (PL-39.doc), which of some reason
> had this text instead of the original (claiming "... not
> received..."). This has now been updated in the latest
> version of Annex M.1.
>
> To my knowledge, ITU has not received any notice about this.
> I haven't done any exhaustive IPR search on this, but do not
> know of anything that will block this recommendation.
>
> Regards,
> Espen
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Frank Derks [mailto:frank.derks@PHILIPS.COM]
> Sent: 5. juli 2000 11:26
> To: ITU-SG16@mailbag.cps.intel.com
> Subject: Intellectual property/patents on H.323 Annex K???
>
>
> H.323 Annex K/APC-1811 (May 2000 meeting), states that the
> ITU has "...received notice of intellectual property,
> protected by patents, which may be required to implement this
> recommendation". Is anyone in a position to inform me which
> patent(s) are
> involved?
>
> Regards,
>
> Frank
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to
> listserv@mailbag.intel.com
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to
> listserv@mailbag.intel.com
>