Hi John,
Is it not that we are just emulating MGCP model in the Stimuls COntrol Protocol provided by H.323 Annex L? I mean, the way a MGC controls an MG using H.248, an Annex L Feature Server controls an H.323 endpoint. According to my understanding it is just that H.248 is used "as is" for the later. Why do we need to tunnel H.248 and between what entities in the network? I shall appreciate your comments in this. thanks Manoj.
-----Original Message----- From: Li, John [mailto:John.Li@Dialogic.com] Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 12:15 PM To: 'Paul, Manoj' Subject: RE: H.248 Syntax im H.323 Annex L
I think, By doing that, H.248 information can be tunneled within h.245 messages, so the H.248 section can be processed by a MEGACO entity directly for interoperability.
Although BER was not a optimal solution (nor was SDP) for encoding in MEGACO, SIG 16 allows it to be used.
John
-----Original Message----- From: Paul, Manoj [mailto:mpaul@TRILLIUM.COM] Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 2:13 PM To: ITU-SG16@mailbag.cps.INTEL.COM Subject: H.248 Syntax im H.323 Annex L
Hi All,
Could someone point out the reason for keeping h248Message codepoint as OCTET STRING in stimulusControl IE in H.323 Version 4 for Annex L support. H.323 Annex L specifies h248Message as OCTET STRING in stimulusControl code point. This surely saves importing H.248 ASN.1 syntax in H.323, but it does require the user to encode/decode H.248 PDUs as text/BER. And then re-encode the H248 message as an OCTET STRING using PER in H.323 UUPDU. Was there any reason why the specific H.248 codepoints were not imported in H.323 so that the user may have to use only PER encode scheme to encode simulusControl IE. Does not the earlier approach necessiates the user to have H.248 implementation with H.323 to support Annex L?
Thanks for your time, Manoj Paul. Trillium Digital Systems, Inc.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to listserv@mailbag.intel.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to listserv@mailbag.intel.com