Hi all,
Is the flavor of Q.931 found in H.225.0 meant to be backward compatible with the "pure" Q.931?
regards,
charles
-----Original Message----- From: Wuerfel, Randy P [mailto:Randy.P.Wuerfel@ICN.SIEMENS.COM] Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2000 1:41 AM To: ITU-SG16@MAILBAG.INTEL.COM Subject: Progress Indicator IE in a PROGRESS Message
In reading through APC-1939 (draft H.225.0 V4) for the Portland meeting, I noticed that the Progress Indicator IE is shown as "O", optional, in the PROGRESS message. It is also shown this way in my copy of H.225.0 V3. However, in Q.931 the Progress Indicator IE is mandatory in the PROGRESS message.
Is there some reason why, for H.225.0 usage, the Progress Indicator IE in the PROGRESS message is optional rather than mandatory, or was this an oversight?
Randy Wuerfel Siemens Enterprise Networks 4900 Old Ironsides Drive Fax: (408) 492-4666 M/S 200 Tel: (408) 492-4375 P.O. Box 58075 E-mail: Randy.P.Wuerfel@icn.siemens.com Santa Clara, CA 95052-8075
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to listserv@mailbag.intel.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to listserv@mailbag.intel.com