Hello Mr.Okubo,
I noticed that Albrecht has submitted a contribution that would be relevant for both Q.5/11 and Q.3/16 so I think that a joint session may be a good idea. Having it so late in the meeting shouldn't be so much of an issue as it will give us a chance to discuss contributions on H.248.55 first and then we can report the status to Q.5/11.
Regards, Christian
OKUBO Sakae wrote:
Dear Mr Schwarz,
At 08:28 +0100 07/12/10, Schwarz Albrecht wrote:
Is there also any joint session with SG11?
Currently no such session is planned. However, we can add it if it is needed.
We are planning to submitt at least one contribution "H.248 Rw Profile Version 2 - Update proposal for Draft Q.3323.2 due to alignment with H.248 Ia Profile Version 2" which might benefit from a joint discussion of Q3/16 and Q5/11.
As the SG11 meeting is of SG level, is it possible to submit the mentioned document also as a Contribution to SG11?
At 15:44 +0800 07/12/10, Tina TSOU wrote:
I support such joint session. How about the opinions from Q.5/11? Session 4, Tuesday 22nd, 2008 might be a good time.
From the SG16 Rapporteur meeting side, the proposed slot is OK because it is reserved for additional session at this moment. If it is too close to the meeting end, the second quarter of Friday, 18 January is also reserved for additional session. Please note, however, that there might be a limitation on the number of rooms, thus we need to check with Mr Sebek, TSB, when our plan has been made.