James! After reviewing your draft, below are my comments. As in regards to H.323, H.323 doesn't currently have an explicit notion of two different fields carrying the exact meaning of "current destination" and "the final recipient", using SIP language. On the other hand, the definition of H.323 URL potentially allows for cascading of URLs of different kinds. This concept appear in the last draft of "Annex O" to be discussed next week. Therefore, tel url can be placed in the "user" part of H.323 URL. Since, in your proposal, the original "final recipient" information (i.e. the phone number itself) is preserved in the tel url after the NPDB deep is performed, I don't see a technical problem for using the proposed algorithm within H.323.
I will bring your work to the attention of H.323 community next week, including the H.323 mobility WG. My question (and that of the H.323 community) would be: what level of consensus does the approach, presented in your draft, currently have within SIP and IPTEL working groups?
Orit Levin RADVision Inc. 575 Corporate Drive Suite 420 Mahwah, NJ 07430 Tel: 1 201 529 4300 (230) Fax: 1 201 529 3516 www.radvision.com orit@radvision.com -----Original Message----- From: James Yu james.yu@neustar.com To: 'Orit Levin' orit@radvision.com; IPTEL WG iptel@lists.bell-labs.com Date: Monday, August 14, 2000 1:24 PM Subject: RE: [IPTEL] A draft of H323-URL to be presented during the IPTEL session
Orit,
Please review the attached draft-yu-tel-url-00.txt, titled "Extensions to the tel and fax URL to support Number Portability." It is intended for the SIP to carry number portability (NP) information in the Request URI field. It may be carried by H.225.0 directly or may be mapped to the proposed
H.323
URL to support NP in H.323.
There has not been lots of discussion on this I-D. Comments from you and others are welcome.
James
-----Original Message----- From: Orit Levin [mailto:orit@radvision.com] Sent: Monday, July 31, 2000 9:05 PM To: IPTEL WG Subject: [IPTEL] A draft of H323-URL to be presented during the IPTEL session
Hello! I have submitted the attached draft 3 weeks ago. Unfortunately, the document doesn't appear on the IETF Drafts site. Since this topic is going to be presented during the IPTEL session on Thursday morning, I am attaching the draft for you review. Best Regards, Orit Levin RADVision Inc. 575 Corporate Drive Suite 420 Mahwah, NJ 07430 Tel: 1 201 529 4300 (230) Fax: 1 201 529 3516 www.radvision.com http://www.radvision.com orit@radvision.com mailto:orit@radvision.com -----Original Message----- From: Orit Levin < orit@radvision.com mailto:orit@radvision.com > To: internet-drafts@ietf.org mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org < internet-drafts@ietf.org mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org > Date: Tuesday, July 11, 2000 1:59 AM Subject: Request for Draft Submission
Hello! I would like to submit the attached paper as the first drafts to become an Informational RFC. Thank you, Orit Levin RADVision Inc. 575 Corporate Drive Suite 420 Mahwah, NJ 07430 Tel: 1 201 529 4300 (230) Fax: 1 201 529 3516 www.radvision.com http://www.radvision.com orit@radvision.com mailto:orit@radvision.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to listserv@mailbag.intel.com