Hi All,
As you may know, the most recent version of H.GEF.1 included a syntax based method of defining GEF extensions. I defined this so that people wouldn't get confused with trying to interpret a syntax based definition as pure ASN.1. My principle is, if you are defining something that is different to something that is already used, then make it obviously different.
I'm fairly comfortable that the syntax is complete. Also, if people don't want to use that method of GEF definition they are not obliged to. I personally would therefore like to keep it in.
However, we live in a democracy. Therefore, the person that gives me the highest bid can decide whether it stays or goes!
Meanwhile, people can vote on whether it stays or goes by e-mailing me directly. I will then summarise and post the results to the list. In the event of a draw I'll keep it in.
All the best,
Pete.
============================================= Pete Cordell Tech-Know-Ware pete@tech-know-ware.com +44 1473 635863 =============================================
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to listserv@mailbag.intel.com