Venkata,
D-284
was a contribution to the October-2002 meeting of SG16, but Question 3/16
did not accept the proposed text because of conflicts with the existing AMR
definitions in H.245. The editor of D-284 was invited to bring a revised
proposal to the next meeting, which seemingly did not happen. That's the reason
why the parameters proposed in D-284 never became a part of
H.245.
Hope
this solves your doubts.
Ernst
Hi,
This email is regarding a clarification
needed about a document submitted to SG16(SG 16 - Delayed contribution
284).
In the Document titled "Update on AMR speech codec support for
H.245", Table X.4 a parameter "octetAlign"
is mentioned. But the same is
missing from the latest H245 formal specification.
As per the
document(Delayed contribution 284), "octetAlign" parameter can be used
to specify
whether the bandwidth efficient or Octet aligned
mode of operation is used.
Since, In the formal spec, this parameter is
missing, how should we negotiate whether
we want to use Bandwidth
efficient or Octet aligned operation.
I also see other
parameters(modeSet, ModeChangePeriod, ModeChangeNeighbour, Crc,
robustSorting and interleaving)
mentioned in your document, but are missing
from the formal spec.
Any information about how to negotiate those
parameters?
Thanks
Venkata