Yes, I would agree that makes sense. This would be
most helpful. Unfortunately, they're all published separately
today.
The current Annex D requires H.245v4.
Annex E requires H.323v2 or higher, as does Annex
F.
I think it would be worth noting this in the IG and then
just pull those separate Annexes into H.323v4 so that we don't have to concern
ourselves with that confusion going forward. Perhaps we should make a
point at the next meeting to raise the issue so that all new separately
published Annexes contain this information. We have several: H, I, J, K,
L, M.1, M.2, and N.
Paul
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, February 29, 2000 11:59
AM
Subject: Re: H.323 Annex D
I will seriously consider pulling Annex D into the main document.
It makes my life a bit easier, too. However, I suppose it's worth
noting which version of H.323 an Annex will work with in general. I
have had similar inquiries about Annex E and Annex F. Perhaps a new
section in the Implementers Guide is in order to address those
issues?
I think that it
should be in the summary of the Recommendation, if we pusblish it separatly.
Not everybody reads the implementor's guide (although they should). That is
what we have done for H.323 to relate it to different versions of H.225.0 and
H.245.