Kaynam,
This is a more serious issue. If there is a backward compatibility problem with the current Annex C that needs to be corrected before decision, we need to address that in September. Alternatively, we could elect to decide Annex C separately in February.
Certainly, bring the contribution. I will talk with Mr. Skran about this issue.
Paul
----- Original Message ----- From: Kaynam Hedayat Kaynam_Hedayat@PICTEL.COM To: ITU-SG16@MAILBAG.INTEL.COM Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 1999 8:47 AM Subject: Re: H.323v3 for decision in September
Hi everyone,
One of the proposals we are planning to bring to the Berlin meeting is for modifications to Annex C. If the additional text is approved in Berlin
will it
be possible to add it to H.323 V3? This is quite important text since it
deals
with backward compatibility of Annex C in H.323 V3 and H.323 V2.
Regards, Kaynam Hedayat
"Paul E. Jones" paul.jones@TIES.ITU.INT on 06/28/99 08:20:51 PM
Please respond to Mailing list for parties associated with ITU-T Study
Group 16
<ITU-SG16@mailbag.cps.intel.com>To: ITU-SG16@mailbag.cps.intel.com cc: (bcc: Kaynam Hedayat/PicTel) Subject: H.323v3 for decision in September
Folks,
We may attempt to decide H.323v3 in September and determine version 4 in February. Mr. Skran has asked that I post the current draft so that
people
can review the document. This document must be delivered to the ITU by 30 June 1999. (Please note that Annex C/H.323 is also a candidate for
decision
in Septemer.)
This document contains only minor editorial changes to the document that
was
determined in Santiago. Nonetheless, I encourage you to review the
document
for any errors or omissions.
The change marks indicate all changes that have been made since version 2.
Please direct any comments on the document to me.
The document can be found here:
ftp://standards.pictel.com/avc-site/Incoming/H.323v3-990628.doc
Best Regards, Paul E. Jones DataBeam Corporation