Hi Radhika,
FYI - the IETF is just starting work on E.164 to IP address resolution - the last IETF meeting covered this subject - and maybe someone on our list is also active there and could help (or server as a contact person)?
Ami
-----Original Message----- From: Roy, Radhika R, ALTEC [SMTP:rrroy@ATT.COM] Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 1998 8:38 PM To: ITU-SG16@mailbag.cps.intel.com Subject: H.323 Addresses
Hi Everyone:
We are discussing about H.323 addresing schemes in our bi-weekly H.323 inter-GK conf calls.
The H.323 addresses that are being considered are 1. E.164, 2. E-mail, 3. URL, and 4. TCP/UDP/RTP port addresses (and 5. aliases as well I guess).
Although a hierarchical notion of addressing scehmes have been discussed, we have also recognized that some other variations of addressing schemes are there.
For example, people change their physical locations, but they might have to keep the same E.164 addresses. So, a translation is needed. Therefore, the very physical relationship of E.164 addressing scheme (e.g., knowing NPAs and NXXs, one can find the distance) has been broken.
Another example can be 800 numbers where the translation is also needed.
In addition, from mobility point of view (device or person) wired (and wireless?) environement may also be looked into.
As we go froward, we may consider many of those aspects as pointed above to provide solutions for the H.323 addressing schemes.
Regards,
Radhika R. Roy AT&T 732 949 8657 rrroy@att.com