Dear Ms. Yan, Mr. Okubo and other Q.12 experts,
Ms. Yan, thank you for your comments on H.bmultipoint draft version 1.1 and I'm sorry for this late reply.
According to your and Mr. Okubo's comments, I have put revised Figure 3 as hbmul3v2.ppt in incoming directory of ftp.gctech.co.jp. The powerpoint file has two figures. One is single physical network interface version, the other is virtual network interface per peer version like H.231.
Which figure is better? Should we need to include "call control" next to Network Interface?
Li>> On 5.6, we only listed four H.245 commands/procedures. I think we Li>> need more to support multipoint. Should we list they all or we are not Li>> really sure what we really want?
I think we should list all of the multipoint specific only. We should not repeat the same text found in H.310 version 2. Could you provide me specific text of the section?
Please allow me a few more days to revise the draft to version 1.2.
Any contributions toward the determination are solicited.
Hidenobu Harasaki (harasaki@ccm.cl.nec.co.jp), editor for H.bmultipoint Principal Researcher C&C Media Research Labs., NEC Corporation Phone: +81 44 856 8083 Fax: +81 44 856 2232
P.S. to Mr. Okubo Please remove hbmulti3.ppt in your Incoming directory.