Please see my responses editted in below.
Regards, Glen
Roy, Radhika R, ALTEC wrote:
Hi Everyone:
I have few comments on the revised Annex G writeup.
- The title is OK
- The scope is not OK. As we talked last time that the scope should be
extended to include the following: * Inter-Gatekeeper Communications within a Domain * Inter-Gatekeeper Communications Between (Administrative) Domains
Did we have consensus on that opinion? If so, I'll change the text and I apologize for missing that. I remember saying that the stake I was placing in the ground was that the protocol is the same for both of these (and some text in the annex states that). Until we have something that shows otherwise I see no reason to change the basic direction of the annex.
In Yokosuka we set the focus of Annex G to be communication between administrative domains. If we start broadening the scope we run the risk of delaying the annex.
- APC-1385 provides outlines for the "Inter-Gatekeeper Communications
within a Domain". The write-up of Annex G should be modified accordingly. 4. The items 2 and 3 had been discussed in the last conference call. Are we going through a circle again? 5. The comments on the remaining text of the document will be reviewed when the fundamental direction of Annex G is put along the line as pointed out above.
Recent AT&T's proposed contribution has also been submitted to complement the write-up in the area of "Inter-Gatekeeper Communications within a Domain".
Thanks and regards,
Radhika R. Roy AT&T Tel: +1 732 949 8657 Email: rrroy@att.com
-- Glen Freundlich ggf@lucent.com Lucent Technologies office: +1 303 538 2899 11900 N. Pecos fax: +1 303 538 3907 Westminster, Colorado 80234 USA