I'm not sure about the first, except that many jurisdictions require support of emergency services such (e.g. 911 in North America). There are definitely regulatory jurisdictions requiring "presentation restricted".
-----Original Message----- From: Paul Long [SMTP:Plong@SMITHMICRO.COM] Sent: Thursday, May 13, 1999 10:41 AM To: ITU-SG16@MAILBAG.INTEL.COM Subject: Caller ID legal issues (was: caller ID and implementer's guide)
(I am straying from the original topic, so I changed the Subject.)
This is not a standards-related issue, so we can end this thread if someone objects, but I was wondering about the legal ramifications of caller ID. Are there laws in some countries that require the following, or is it just considered good etiquette and/or a market-driven feature?
Caller ID to be transmitted if provided by the caller
Caller ID not to be displayed to the called party if so requested by the caller ("presentation restricted")
Paul Long Smith Micro Software, Inc.
-----Original Message----- From: Chris Purvis [SMTP:Chris.Purvis@MADGE.COM] Sent: Thursday, May 13, 1999 8:28 AM To: ITU-SG16@MAILBAG.INTEL.COM Subject: Re: caller ID and implementer's guide Pete, Just a note about the security matter you mention. Some PC based H.323 endpoints allow one, with just a littleknowledge, to persuade them to output debugging which includes all elements of decoded RAS/Q.931-H.225.0/H.245 messages. This is clearly "undesirable" when security of information contained in such messages is required! It also might be quite hard for some people to switch off. I don't have a solution to this: I just raise it as an issue.
Regards, Chris -- Dr Chris Purvis - Senior Development Engineer, WAVE CC Software Madge Networks Ltd, Wexham Springs, Framewood Road, Wexham, Berks.ENGLAND Phone: +44 1753 661 359 email: cpurvis@madge.com