Re: Progress syntax changed v2 to v3?

2 Mar 2000

      Paul,
The H.323v3 text is correct.  The extension marker was misplaced in the
published H.225v2 document and was corrected in the H.323 Implementers Guide
in September 1998.
Paul
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Long" plong@SMITHMICRO.COM
To: ITU-SG16@mailbag.cps.intel.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2000 11:20 AM
Subject: Progress syntax changed v2 to v3?
...
It looks like the syntax for Progress changed between H.225.0v2 and v3.
Seems like this would present some rather basic interoperability problems.
Do I simply have the wrong syntax for v3?
This is the syntax for Progress in the published H.225.0v2 Recommendation
from the ITU:
Progress-UUIE ::= SEQUENCE
{
        protocolIdentifier                      ProtocolIdentifier,
        destinationInfo                 EndpointType,
        h245Address                             TransportAddress OPTIONAL,
        callIdentifier                          CallIdentifier,
        h245SecurityMode                        H245Security OPTIONAL,
        ...,
        tokens                                  SEQUENCE OF ClearToken
OPTIONAL,
...
    cryptoTokens                    SEQUENCE OF CryptoH323Token

OPTIONAL,
...
    fastStart                               SEQUENCE OF OCTET STRING

OPTIONAL,
...
}
...and this is the syntax for the same type in v3:
Progress-UUIE ::= SEQUENCE
{
        protocolIdentifier              ProtocolIdentifier,
        destinationInfo         EndpointType,
        h245Address                     TransportAddress OPTIONAL,
        callIdentifier                  CallIdentifier,
        h245SecurityMode                H245Security OPTIONAL,
        tokens                          SEQUENCE OF ClearToken OPTIONAL,
        cryptoTokens                    SEQUENCE OF CryptoH323Token
OPTIONAL,
...
    fastStart                       SEQUENCE OF OCTET STRING OPTIONAL,
    ...,
    multipleCalls                   BOOLEAN,
    maintainConnection              BOOLEAN

}
Paul Long
Smith Micro Software, Inc.

Re: Progress syntax changed v2 to v3?

Paul E. Jones