Paul,
This works in point to point and I am not
sure why you need multicast in this case. Also you are not doing multicast
H.245. So there is an MC
Now let's take the case of an MC that has
three participants in the multicast group.
The first one sends an OLC with payload
type 100. The second one sends an OLC with payload type 101 and the third with
payload type of 102. Now the MC needs to send an OLC to the first participant,
which payload type should it use 101,102,100?
Roni
From:
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008
6:47 PM
To: Even, Roni;
itu-sg16@lists.packetizer.com
Subject: RE: [itu-sg16] AVD 3299
Roni,
I guess I am still
missing your point. This is a means of sending media, just like
unicast. The payload type numbers are selected by the sender, just as
they are for unicast. If the recipient accepts the proposed OLC, then it
would listen on the multicast address for incoming media accordingly.
Paul
From: Even, Roni
[mailto:roni.even@polycom.co.il]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008
11:24 AM
To:
Subject: RE: [itu-sg16] AVD 3299
Paul,
Is the multicast uni-directional, is it
just a point to point. If it is to be used to enable the EP to send media to a
multicast group this should be aligned with the media the other side except to
receive. How does it get set
Roni
From:
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008
6:20 PM
To: Even, Roni;
itu-sg16@lists.packetizer.com
Subject: RE: [itu-sg16] AVD 3299
Roni,
I don’t
understand your concern. Can you clarify the problem?
Paul
From:
itu-sg16-bounces@lists.packetizer.com
[mailto:itu-sg16-bounces@lists.packetizer.com] On Behalf Of Even, Roni
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008
11:06 AM
To: itu-sg16@lists.packetizer.com
Subject: [itu-sg16] AVD 3299
Hi,
I looked at the document and I think I understand the OLC
procedure. I need it does not address how you decide on a dynamic payload type
number when needed.
The OLC gives the dynamic payload type number to send
Roni