Frank,
There was a change proposed for the H.323 IG in the March Launceston meeting on this subject. The proposal was to allow both Binary (PER !) and Text. The outcome of the meeting is contained in TD-44 of the Launceston meeting. I guess this is for approval in Brazil.
Karl
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Frank Derks [mailto:frank.derks@PHILIPS.COM] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. Mai 2001 15:08 An: ITU-SG16@mailbag.cps.INTEL.COM Betreff: Encoding of H.248 in H.323
H.248 specifies both a binary (using the BER) and a text format for the encoding of its messages. 7.2.2.28/H.225.0 states that either of these formats can be used for H.323 Annex L.
Are there reasons, other than the fact that the BER and text are specified in H.248, to dissallow encoding using the PER? It would seem that having to use two different encoding schemes (PER+BER or PER+text) makes things unnecessarily complex.
Regards,
Frank
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to listserv@mailbag.intel.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to listserv@mailbag.intel.com