GDay Tom, My suggestion would be rather to have a phone or video conference/s for the issues. That way all active interested parties can attend. As highlighted by others on the list in this current climate some people are unable to travel to meetings. This would also elimate throwing decisions over the fence and people complaining that they weren't part of the process. I had in mind a moderated conference by yourself as Megaco Chairman and Glen Fruendlich as SG16 Q.3 Rapportuer. This conference should be for active participants rather than those just listening in. That way both groups have input and are part of any decisions even if the decisions don't favour them. Regards, Christian Tom-PT Taylor wrote:
We started to debate H.248v2 this morning. There will definitely be a document put out for approval in February. At a minimum it will contain the merged Implementor's Guide and H.248v1. The debate is over what else it might contain.
I will ask for time for a WG meeting. We will probably have some discussion of our own, and we can also tackle some of the less tractable issues from the list.
Tom Taylor taylor@nortelnetworks.com Ph. +1 613 736 0961 (ESN 396 1490)
_______________________________________________ Megaco mailing list Megaco@ietf.org http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco