> Francois,
>
> Woohoo!!!! :-)
>
> Actually, I suppose earlyH245Control could contain multiple
> H.245 messages,
> since it will presumably be defined the same as h245Control:

Yes, I had meant to make a comment about this yesterday, but I had
already disconnect from dial-up.

> Given:
> H245Control ::= SEQUENCE OF OCTET STRING OPTIONAL
>
> therefore:
>         h245Control                     H245Control,
> and:
>         earlyh245Control                H245Control,

Looks good to me.