Re: [h323plus] [Openh323-devel] [Openh323gk-developer] [Opalvoip-devel]opalvoip vs h323plus
Robert Let me clear something up. GnuGk has numerous new features with the h323plus library over the openh323 library including H.350 LDAP, H.341 SNMP and numereous H.460 features including H.460.9 real-time Qos measurements, H.460.followme and the latest H.460 NAT Traversal technology P2Pnat Media and Presence implementation which should be available in the v2.2.8 release. The project is continuing it's evolutionary development just fine without the need for Opal. I wish to caution you on misleading people. Opal currently, as far as I know, has no additional H.323 features over the existing openh323 library (aside the video plugins support) unless I'm mistaken looking at the SVN I can't see anything new?. While h323plus which has been developed over the last 12 months as a branch of openh323 and has a substantial array, as mentioned previously, of new features http://www.h323plus.org/standards/ most of which are not currently available in OpalVoIP. Now, as I said before, you are quite welcome to port any of these ideas to Opal but to infer the latest wizzbang H.323 stuff is in Opal (at least at the moment) is being misleading... I carefully remind you that the decision to fork Opal out of OpenH323 was yours and Craig's decision and you did so with your eyes wide open and the subsequent malee that has ensued as a result is something we will all have to live and deal with. On that note, I strongly suggest, as I hinted before, we bring this discussion to a permanent close. Simon -----Original Message----- From: openh323-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:openh323-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of Robert Jongbloed Sent: Sunday, 4 November 2007 1:44 PM To: 'Discussion on enhancements and development issues with the OpenH323 library' Cc: h323plus@lists.packetizer.com; Opalvoip-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Openh323-devel] [Openh323gk-developer] [Opalvoip-devel]opalvoip vs h323plus
-----Original Message----- From: openh323-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:openh323- devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Jan Willamowius .... The main point for GnuGk is that there is very little to be gained from a move to OPAL. Its not that I dislike anything thats in there, we just don't need 90% of the framework OPAL provides. ....
And that is fine, you can stay with OpenH323. There are two classes of legacy user: ones such as GnuGk for which OpenH323 v1.18 does exactly what they want and they need no more features. Except maybe the odd bug fix, the code is as it is. The second class are people with ongoing application development are in continuous need of the "next new thing" in the feature list. These are the people we were hoping to make OPAL sufficiently attractive, due to its new whiz bang wonder gizmos, to convert to OPAL from OpenH323. Oh, and suppose there is a third class of those who have not yet started their project. They should have no reason not to use OPAL. We don't want them to have a reason. And a major reason for moving OPAL to a its own project was not to "fork" the code, but to reduce the confusion between OpenH323 and OPAL. I will reiterate what I and Craig have been saying all along: we are NOT abandoning OpenH323 completely. We just have not been doing any NEW work there as it is a duplication of effort. It is more akin to Ethereal and Wireshark, Ethereal is what it is at that point of time and all new stuff is in Wireshark. It is not, and never was, intended that this be a true "fork" where A goes it's way and B goes theirs. This is the whole reason why I am so disappointed with the ensuing result. Remember, this whole thread started with someone asking the question "Should I use OpenH323 or OPAL, which is better?", a fair question but one that I did not want anyone to have to ask. Robert Jongbloed OPAL/OpenH323 Architect and Co-founder. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Openh323-devel mailing list Openh323-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323-devel
-----Original Message----- From: opalvoip-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:opalvoip- devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Simon Horne ... Let me clear something up. GnuGk has numerous new features with the h323plus library over the openh323 library including H.350 LDAP, H.341 SNMP and numereous H.460 features including H.460.9 real-time Qos measurements, H.460.followme and the latest H.460 NAT Traversal technology P2Pnat Media and Presence implementation which should be available in the v2.2.8 release. The project is continuing it's evolutionary development just fine without the need for Opal.
OK, that was a misinterpretation by me when Jan said he did not need 90% of OPAL code. I extrapolated that to mean he did not use much of OpenH323 either. And I was unaware that they have been using the "plus" branch, I incorrectly assumed they were on the trunk.
I wish to caution you on misleading people.
Oh, now things are getting nasty. When accusations like this happen it is certainly time for the discussion to stop.
Opal currently, as far as I know, has no additional H.323 features over the existing openh323 library (aside the video plugins support) unless I'm mistaken looking at the SVN I can't see anything new?. While h323plus which has been developed over the last 12 months as a branch of openh323 and has a substantial array, as mentioned previously, of new features http://www.h323plus.org/standards/ most of which are not currently available in OpalVoIP.
And why are they not in OPAL? Because effort is divided between two libraries.
Now, as I said before, you are quite welcome to port any of these ideas to Opal but to infer the latest wizzbang H.323 stuff is in Opal (at least at the moment) is being misleading...
That is not what I meant. I did not mention OpenH323 features explicitly. And if things had gone the way I had originally envisioned with all new development being in OPAL then this statement would be 100% true. As it is, it is only true for non-H.323 features.
I carefully remind you that the decision to fork Opal out of OpenH323 was
There is that work "fork" again, even though I have tried hard to remove it from perceptions. The real fork happened FOUR YEAR AGO. The move to a different repository is just admin.
On that note, I strongly suggest, as I hinted before, we bring this discussion to a permanent close.
Agreed. But accusations of deliberately misleading people could not go unanswered. Robert Jongbloed OPAL/OpenH323 Architect and Co-founder.
Simon Horne wrote: ..deleted
I carefully remind you that the decision to fork Opal out of OpenH323 was yours and Craig's decision and you did so with your eyes wide open and the subsequent malee that has ensued as a result is something we will all have to live and deal with. On that note, I strongly suggest, as I hinted before, we bring this discussion to a permanent close.
Gee - I spend a day away from the computer with my family and look what happens on the list :) I agree that there is no point continuing this discussion in it's present form. I think that everyone knows what the situation is - the horse is dead and everyone else has moved on. I am still incredibly humbled by the fact that this codebase still has the power to induce such passions in people. This shows that there is still life in the project(s) yet :) Craig ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Craig Southeren Post Increment – VoIP Consulting and Software craigs@postincrement.com.au www.postincrement.com.au Phone: +61 243654666 ICQ: #86852844 Fax: +61 243656905 MSN: craig_southeren@hotmail.com Mobile: +61 417231046 Jabber: craigs@jabber.org "Science is the poetry of reality." Richard Dawkins
participants (3)
-
Craig Southeren -
Robert Jongbloed -
Simon Horne