Simon, excuse me, but you did it wrong way.

Variable “tag” must be set to the value of aliasAddressTypes[i].tag BEFORE comparing it with H225_AliasAddress::e_h323_ID.

1. tag = aliasAddressTypes[i].tag;

2. if (tag == H225_AliasAddress::e_h323_ID …

That was in my patch.

In your variant variable “tag”, when compared with H225_AliasAddress::e_h323_ID, has the value supplied as function argument.

From: Simon Horne [mailto:s.horne@spranto.com]
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2014 4:53 PM
To: 'Denis Kochmashev'; h323plus@lists.packetizer.com
Subject: RE: [h323plus] Some issues with h323pdu.cxx

Denis

Agreed and checked in.

Simon

From: h323plus-bounces@lists.packetizer.com [mailto:h323plus-bounces@lists.packetizer.com] On Behalf Of Denis Kochmashev
Sent: 14 February 2014 20:41
To: 'Simon Horne'; h323plus@lists.packetizer.com
Subject: Re: [h323plus] Some issues with h323pdu.cxx

Right!

Do you agree with it?

From: Simon Horne [mailto:s.horne@spranto.com]
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2014 4:33 PM
To: 'Denis Kochmashev'; h323plus@lists.packetizer.com
Subject: RE: [h323plus] Some issues with h323pdu.cxx

Denis

So the logic is

Dialed                                      Alias Type

123456                                      dialedDigits

user                                           h323-id

h323:123456                           h323-id

h323:user                                h323-id

h323:user@domain.com  url-id

Is that the intended behavior?

Simon

From: h323plus-bounces@lists.packetizer.com [mailto:h323plus-bounces@lists.packetizer.com] On Behalf Of Denis Kochmashev
Sent: 14 February 2014 17:16
To: h323plus@lists.packetizer.com
Subject: Re: [h323plus] Some issues with h323pdu.cxx

Simon,

I was just pointing to the problem, which I thought must be solved somehow. And I was not sure that my solution is the right one. Now I'm sure that it is wrong. I apologize for my mistake.

After reading chapters

- “7.1.4 H.323 URL scheme”;

- “O.5 Encoding of H.323 URL in H.323 messages”;

- “O.6 Non-H.323 URLs and URIs within the context of H.323”

from “H.323 (12/2009)” I propose another one.

From: Simon Horne [mailto:s.horne@spranto.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 10:56 PM
To: 'Denis Kochmashev'; h323plus@lists.packetizer.com
Subject: RE: [h323plus] Some issues with h323pdu.cxx

Denis

Patch applied. Thx

Note I have been reliably informed the h323: prefix means URL alias type but I agree with you.

Simon

From: h323plus-bounces@lists.packetizer.com [mailto:h323plus-bounces@lists.packetizer.com] On Behalf Of Denis Kochmashev
Sent: 13 February 2014 18:41
To: h323plus@lists.packetizer.com
Subject: [h323plus] Some issues with h323pdu.cxx

Hello!

Please correct me if I’m wrong, but

1. It looks like there is a small mistake in h323pdu.cxx which doesn’t allow to build h323plus without H.235 being enabled.

2. I’ve found that ‘H323SetAliasAddress(const PString & _name, H225_AliasAddress & alias, int tag)’ doesn’t allow to set AliasAddress of type h323_ID if it looks like dialedDigits even if _name begins with ‘h323:’. For example, if I specify _name = ‘h323:12345’, alias tag will all the same be dialedDigits because it looks like them. I suggest a small change to H323SetAliasAddress, because now it produces unpredictable results.

Thanks,

Denis